From r/ObsidianMD 📅 Jun 7, 2026 • 📊 42 upvotes • ⭐ 8/10 • 🚀 high
*Analysis generated: Jun 8, 2026*
🔗 Source: View on Reddit
—

Summary

A plugin author highlights critical issues with Obsidian’s plugin review system, including lengthy waiting times for manual reviews (even for minor manifest changes) and problems with linter warnings/errors. These issues prevent timely updates and new plugin releases.

Key Insights

1. Obsidian’s plugin review system has critical bottlenecks affecting updates and new releases
2. Minor manifest changes requiring lengthy manual reviews hinder developer workflow
3. A streamlined and more transparent review process is crucial for a thriving plugin ecosystem

Enhancement Suggestions

1. Implement Automated Linter & Basic Sanity Checks: Introduce an automated pre-review system that checks for common linter errors, manifest validity, and basic security patterns immediately upon submission, providing instant feedback to developers and reducing manual review load.
2. Tiered Review Process with Fast-Track for Minor Updates: Establish a tiered system where manifest-only changes or minor bug fixes receive an accelerated, lightweight review, separate from full new plugin submissions or major feature updates.
3. Transparent Review Queue and Status Updates: Provide developers with a public-facing dashboard or system to track their plugin’s position in the review queue, estimated wait times, and detailed status updates, fostering transparency and managing expectations.

Analysis

This post identifies a significant bottleneck in the Obsidian ecosystem that directly impacts plugin developers and, by extension, the broader user base. Addressing these issues would greatly improve the quality and availability of community plugins.
—
*Curated by AI for Paul’s Vault Members*