From r/ObsidianMD π
β’ π 11 upvotes β’ β 7/10 β’ π high
*Analysis generated: Feb 23, 2026*
π Source: View on Reddit
—
Summary
An engineering student finds their current note-taking structure in Obsidianβa master class note leading to topic notes that are rarely linked back toβis preventing them from utilizing the app’s connection-making features (like the ‘wiki’ feature). They are looking for advice on implementing methods like Zettelkasten or MOCs while maintaining the self-contained structure necessary for easy exam review due to the rigid nature of college coursework.
Key Insights
1. Students/Professionals in structured fields struggle to reconcile rigid content requirements with emergent linking principles.
2. There is a perceived conflict between creating standalone notes for review and creating deeply interconnected notes for synthesis.
3. Need for a practical, low-effort method to integrate linking without sacrificing structural integrity for exams.
Enhancement Suggestions
No enhancement suggestions available
Analysis
This is a classic tension point: balancing linear, structured review (common in education/work) with emergent, networked thinking (the strength of Obsidian). The user needs a practical hybrid solution.
—
*Curated by AI for Paul’s Vault Members*
